From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hampton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 30, 2002
300 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-03079

Submitted December 12, 2002.

December 30, 2002.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), dated March 22, 2001, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Andrew C. Fine, New York, N.Y. (Adrienne Hale of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Anthea H. Bruffee of counsel), for respondent.

Before: NANCY E. SMITH, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, LEO F. McGINITY, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court's determination designating him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus, should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n; People v. Wroten, 286 A.D.2d 189).

SMITH, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, FRIEDMANN and McGINITY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hampton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 30, 2002
300 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Hampton

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, respondent, v. JAMEL HAMPTON, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 30, 2002

Citations

300 A.D.2d 641 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
751 N.Y.S.2d 428

Citing Cases

State v. Hands

A departure from the presumptive risk level recommended by the New York State Board of Examiners of Sex…

People v. Williams

A departure from the presumptive risk level is warranted only where "there exists an aggravating or…