From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hampton

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 30, 2007
478 Mich. 865 (Mich. 2007)

Opinion

No. 132873.

May 30, 2007.

Court of Appeals No. 262956.


Summary Dispositions.

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for correction of the judgment of sentence to reflect the sentence and restitution actually imposed by the court at sentencing. The trial court sentenced the defendant to serve a prison term of 40 to 120 months for his conviction of assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than murder, MCL 750.84; however, the judgment of sentence indicates that the sentence for this offense is one to five years. In addition, the judgment of sentence fails to reflect that the trial court ordered the defendant to pay restitution of $9,115. The trial court is further ordered to ensure that the corrected judgment of sentence is transmitted to the Department of Corrections. In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Hampton

Supreme Court of Michigan
May 30, 2007
478 Mich. 865 (Mich. 2007)
Case details for

People v. Hampton

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KANYAMA HAMPTON…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: May 30, 2007

Citations

478 Mich. 865 (Mich. 2007)
731 N.W.2d 691

Citing Cases

People v. Medlin

A judgment of sentence should reflect the sentence, including restitution, actually imposed by the trial…