From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hammonds

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 17, 2012
91 A.D.3d 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-01-17

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Charles HAMMONDS, appellant.

Janet A. Gandolfo, Sleepy Hollow, N.Y., for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Steven A. Bender and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent.


Janet A. Gandolfo, Sleepy Hollow, N.Y., for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Steven A. Bender and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Cacace, J.), rendered June 1, 2010, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not voluntary because it was coerced is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw his plea on that ground ( see CPL 470.05[2]; People v. Strong, 80 A.D.3d 717, 914 N.Y.S.2d 679; People v. Scivolette, 80 A.D.3d 630, 914 N.Y.S.2d 662; People v. Martinez, 78 A.D.3d 966, 910 N.Y.S.2d 684). The defendant's additional contention that his plea was not voluntary because he expressed some hesitancy in entering the plea is likewise unpreserved for appellate review ( see People v. Antoine, 59 A.D.3d 560, 872 N.Y.S.2d 283; People v. Castillo–Cordero, 54 A.D.3d 1054, 864 N.Y.S.2d 567; People v. Bevins, 27 A.D.3d 572, 811 N.Y.S.2d 429; People v. Martin, 7 A.D.3d 640, 776 N.Y.S.2d 499). In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant's plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made ( see People v. Fiumefreddo, 82 N.Y.2d 536, 543, 605 N.Y.S.2d 671, 626 N.E.2d 646; People v. Callahan, 80 N.Y.2d 273, 283, 590 N.Y.S.2d 46, 604 N.E.2d 108; People v. Moissett, 76 N.Y.2d 909, 910–911, 563 N.Y.S.2d 43, 564 N.E.2d 653; People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 16, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170; People v. Nixon, 21 N.Y.2d 338, 287 N.Y.S.2d 659, 234 N.E.2d 687, cert. denied sub nom. Robinson v. New York, 393 U.S. 1067, 89 S.Ct. 721, 21 L.Ed.2d 709).

RIVERA, J.P., ENG, CHAMBERS, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hammonds

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 17, 2012
91 A.D.3d 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Hammonds

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Charles HAMMONDS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 17, 2012

Citations

91 A.D.3d 791 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
936 N.Y.S.2d 905
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 386

Citing Cases

People v. Salgado

Further, the defendant never orally confirmed that he grasped the concept of the appeal waiver and the nature…

People v. Pelaez

Here, the defendant's plea of guilty was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered ( see People v.…