Opinion
October 7, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J.
Present — Callahan, J.P., Green, Pine, Boehm and Davis, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the suppression court should have suppressed the rifle seized from his room because the People failed to meet their burden of establishing exigent circumstances to justify the warrantless entry and search by the police (see, People v Hodge, 44 N.Y.2d 553, 557; People v Vennor, 176 A.D.2d 1217). We disagree. The record fully supports the court's finding that the police actions were justified.