From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hamil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1985
110 A.D.2d 659 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

April 1, 1985

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Namm, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

The sentence imposed on defendant as a second felony offender is the minimum legal sentence for the crime to which he pleaded guilty ( see, Penal Law § 70.06 [b]; [4] [b]; § 140.30). Although it was not the sentence originally agreed to, defendant was afforded an opportunity to withdraw his plea prior to imposition of sentence and, after consultation with counsel, declined to do so. We find no reason to set aside that sentence. Titone, J.P., Lazer, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hamil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1985
110 A.D.2d 659 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Hamil

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EDWARD HAMIL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1985

Citations

110 A.D.2d 659 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Pistone

We find that the court properly determined that it could not abide by its sentence promise. Accordingly, the…