From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hamer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 20, 1988
141 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

June 20, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Demakos, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that his conviction of assault in the second degree should be reduced to assault in the third degree because the evidence was insufficient to prove that he injured his victim with a dangerous instrument (Penal Law § 120.05). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the conviction for assault in the second degree. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15). Lawrence, J.P., Weinstein, Spatt and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hamer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 20, 1988
141 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Hamer

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT HAMER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 20, 1988

Citations

141 A.D.2d 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)