From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hall, Carter, Clinton

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Feb 7, 1977
89 Misc. 2d 836 (N.Y. App. Term 1977)

Opinion

February 7, 1977

Appeal from the County Court of Nassau County, RICHARD C. DELIN, J.

Sutter, Moffatt, Yannelli Zevin, P.C. (Marvin Zevin of counsel), for appellants.

Denis Dillon, District Attorney (Herbert H. Esrick of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM. Judgments of conviction unanimously reversed on the law and facts and a new trial ordered.

In light of the concession of the People, and after reviewing the record on appeal, we are of the opinion that the absence of judicial supervision in unsealing the tapes of the recorded conversations before the Grand Jury rendered said tapes inadmissible in evidence (People v Sher, 38 N.Y.2d 600, 603-605). We also find that the procedure then in use to preserve the sanctity and integrity of the tapes was grossly inadequate in that no log was kept as to the movement of the tapes and that the tapes themselves were not sealed in such a way so that a breaking of the seal could be detected.

Concur — FARLEY, P.J., PITTONI and SILBERMAN, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Hall, Carter, Clinton

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Feb 7, 1977
89 Misc. 2d 836 (N.Y. App. Term 1977)
Case details for

People v. Hall, Carter, Clinton

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GLADYS MAE HALL…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Feb 7, 1977

Citations

89 Misc. 2d 836 (N.Y. App. Term 1977)
393 N.Y.S.2d 143