From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 4, 1910
136 App. Div. 664 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)

Opinion

March 4, 1910.

William H. Hale, appellant, in person.

Harry S. Sullivan [ Herman Stiefel and Archibald R. Watson with him on the brief], for the respondent.


The defendant was charged with a violation of the provisions of section 1188 of the amended charter of the city of New York (Laws of 1901, chap. 466), in refusing permission to a sanitary inspector of the department of health to enter and examine the premises of the defendant as to their sanitary condition. The papers on appeal state that the demurrer was overruled without written order, and that the appeal is taken from the oral order so overruling the demurrer. Aside from the question of the validity of the act which the defendant is charged with transgressing, and which is not considered, no authority for the practice adopted by the appellant is known to the court and none is furnished in the brief. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed, but without costs.

JENKS, BURR, THOMAS and CARR, JJ., concurred.

Appeal dismissed, without costs.


Summaries of

People v. Hale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 4, 1910
136 App. Div. 664 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for

People v. Hale

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . WILLIAM H. HALE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 4, 1910

Citations

136 App. Div. 664 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
121 N.Y.S. 473

Citing Cases

People v. Rudnick

The record contains no written order denying defendant's motion. An intermediate order may be reviewed on an…