From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Haddon

Michigan Court of Appeals
May 27, 1971
34 Mich. App. 157 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

Docket Nos. 10889, 11079.

Decided May 27, 1971.

Appeal from Recorder's Court of Detroit, Frank G. Schemanske, J. Submitted Division 1 April 20, 1971, at Lansing. (Docket Nos. 10889, 11079.) Decided May 27, 1971.

Reginald Haddon and James Hinton were convicted, on their pleas of guilty, of unarmed robbery. Defendants appeal. Affirmed.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Department, and Arthur N. Bishop, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

Carl Ziemba, for defendants on appeal.

Before: DANHOF, P.J., and McGREGOR and QUINN, JJ.


These two cases were consolidated by order of this Court. The defendants and a third person pled guilty to an added count of robbery unarmed. MCLA § 750.530 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.798).

On appeal the defendants claim it was error for the trial judge to advise them simultaneously of their rights, and to fail to advise them of their right to remain silent. The judge obtained individual responses from the defendants, and he was not required to advise them of their right to remain silent, although he did so advise defendant Haddon. People v. Jaworski (1970), 25 Mich. App. 540, leave to appeal granted (1970), 384 Mich. 766; People v. Sepulvado (1970), 27 Mich. App. 66; and People v. Malcom (1970), 27 Mich. App. 205. The questions sought to be reviewed are so unsubstantial as to require no argument or formal submission.

Motion to affirm is granted.


Summaries of

People v. Haddon

Michigan Court of Appeals
May 27, 1971
34 Mich. App. 157 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

People v. Haddon

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. HADDON PEOPLE v. HINTON

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: May 27, 1971

Citations

34 Mich. App. 157 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971)
190 N.W.2d 748