From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Guzman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Dec 30, 2016
50 N.Y.S.3d 27 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)

Opinion

No. 570532/12.

12-30-2016

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward GUZMAN, Defendant–Appellant.


Judgment of conviction (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered February 20, 2012, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed and surcharge, if paid, remitted.

As the People concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated since the plea record lacks the requisite "affirmative showing" that defendant understood and waived his Boykin rights (see Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242 [1969] ; People v. Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 365 [2013] ). The People also agree that dismissal of the accusatory instrument is the appropriate corrective action in this particular case (cf. People v. Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, n. 1 [2015] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur.


Summaries of

People v. Guzman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Dec 30, 2016
50 N.Y.S.3d 27 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)
Case details for

People v. Guzman

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward GUZMAN…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 30, 2016

Citations

50 N.Y.S.3d 27 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)