From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Guzman

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Feb 15, 2012
E050850 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 15, 2012)

Opinion

E050850

02-15-2012

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAIRO FIDEL GUZMAN, Defendant and Appellant.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

(Super.Ct.No. RIF143965)


ORDER MODIFYING

OPINION AND DENYING

PETITION FOR REHEARING


[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

The petition for rehearing is denied. The opinion filed in this matter on January 4, 2012, is modified as follows:

1. On pages 22 through 23, the sentence "Defendant noted that his "prior two strikes were based on a single course of conduct.", i.e., there was only one incident but two victims," is modified to read: "Defendant noted that his prior two strikes were based on a single course of conduct."

2. On page 28, in footnote No. 6, the sentence "Defense counsel declined to so because, in fact, defendant's prior convictions were not divisible behavior," is modified to read: "Defense counsel declined to so because, in fact, defendant's prior conviction offenses were definitively divisible behavior.

3. On pages 28 through 29, the paragraph that begins "Second, it is clear from the record . . ." is modified by removing the following sentences: "Defendant initially stated in his moving papers the prior offenses involved two separate victims in which case defendant's prior strike conduct would have come within the multiple victim exception to section 654's dictates. (People v. Deloza (1998) 18 Cal.4th 585, 592.) Only at the hearing on his motion did defendant state that the offenses were committed against a single victim, which he admitted occurred at different times, albeit, during the same day."

Except for these modifications, the opinion remains unchanged. The modification does not affect a change in the judgment.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

MILLER

J.

We concur:

McKINSTER

Acting P. J.

CODRINGTON

J.


Summaries of

People v. Guzman

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Feb 15, 2012
E050850 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 15, 2012)
Case details for

People v. Guzman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JAIRO FIDEL GUZMAN, Defendant and…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO

Date published: Feb 15, 2012

Citations

E050850 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 15, 2012)