From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Guzman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1992
186 A.D.2d 369 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 1, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Harold J. Rothwax, J.).


The trial court did not make an untimely Sandoval determination inasmuch as defense counsel did not press for an early ruling and only moved for the ruling at the conclusion of the direct examination of the People's last witness.

Further, the prosecutor's references during summation to a statement not in evidence did not bolster the testimony of the only witness to the shooting. Defendant's general objection to the People's comments failed to preserve this claim for appellate review (People v Balls, 69 N.Y.2d 641). In any event, a review of the record reveals that the references were made in fair response to comments made by defense counsel in his summation. Thus, the comments were well within the bounds of rhetorical comment permissible in closing argument (People v Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Asch and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Guzman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1992
186 A.D.2d 369 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Guzman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MOLIK GUZMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 369 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Citing Cases

People v. Alvarez

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Eugene Oliver, Jr., J.). Defendant's general objections to two…