People v. Guyton

1 Citing case

  1. Ceasor v. Ocwieja

    655 F. App'x 263 (6th Cir. 2016)   Cited 17 times
    Stating that trial counsel may have been ineffective in a child abuse case for failing to call expert to rebut prosecution experts' theory that the victim had been injured through shaken baby syndrome

    Similarly, an attorney's questions or examinations of witnesses are not evidence. See United States v. Ross, 703 F.3d 856, 885 (6th Cir. 2012); United States v. Campbell, 317 F.3d 597, 607 (6th Cir. 2003); People v. Guyton, No. 317970, 2014 WL 6783764, at *1 n.1 (Mich. Ct. App. Dec. 2, 2014); People v. Bunn, No. 182595, 1996 WL 33324020, at *1 (Mich. Ct. App. July 19, 1996). At trial, Dr. Gilmer-Hill testified that Brenden's subdural hematoma and retinal hemorrhaging were consistent with, and diagnostic of, child abuse.