From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gustavo-Cano

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 26, 2017
149 A.D.3d 1100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

04-26-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jose GUSTAVO–CANO, appellant.

Gary E. Eisenberg, New City, NY, for appellant. Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, NY (Itamar J. Yeger of counsel), for respondent.


Gary E. Eisenberg, New City, NY, for appellant.

Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, NY (Itamar J. Yeger of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered March 18, 2015, convicting him of attempted assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court failed to inform him of the immigration consequences of his plea of guilty is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v. Peque, 22 N.Y.3d 168, 183, 980 N.Y.S.2d 280, 3 N.E.3d 617 ; People v. Stewart, 142 A.D.3d 629, 629, 36 N.Y.S.3d 602 ; People v. Egbunike, 133 A.D.3d 776, 777, 19 N.Y.S.3d 184 ; People v. DiPietro, 115 A.D.3d 977, 982 N.Y.S.2d 397 ). In any event, the record reveals that the court advised the defendant of the possibility that he might be deported as a result of his plea of guilty (see People v. Martial, 125 A.D.3d 688, 689, 2 N.Y.S.3d 591 ; People v. Taveras, 123 A.D.3d 745, 745, 997 N.Y.S.2d 490 ; People v. DiPietro, 115 A.D.3d at 977, 982 N.Y.S.2d 397 ).

Inasmuch as the record does not conclusively demonstrate whether the defendant's counsel advised him of the immigration consequences of his plea of guilty, the defendant's contention that his counsel was ineffective for failing to do so cannot be resolved without reference to matter outside the record. Accordingly, a CPL 440.10 proceeding is the appropriate forum for reviewing the defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim in its entirety (see People v. Taveras, 123 A.D.3d at 745–746, 997 N.Y.S.2d 490 ; People v. Rodriguez, 115 A.D.3d 884, 982 N.Y.S.2d 334 ; People v. Drammeh, 100 A.D.3d 650, 651, 953 N.Y.S.2d 274 ).

ENG, P.J., HALL, ROMAN and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Gustavo-Cano

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 26, 2017
149 A.D.3d 1100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Gustavo-Cano

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jose GUSTAVO–CANO, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 26, 2017

Citations

149 A.D.3d 1100 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
50 N.Y.S.3d 882

Citing Cases

People v. Romero

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court failed to adequately…

People v. Villalta

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not entered voluntarily because the Supreme Court…