From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Guamal

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 27, 2013
104 A.D.3d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-03-27

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Luis GUAMAL, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. *918Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Joyce Slevin, and Maria Park of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y., for appellant. *918Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Joyce Slevin, and Maria Park of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dwyer, J.), imposed January 25, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal ( see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

ENG, P.J., SKELOS, ROMAN, COHEN and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Guamal

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 27, 2013
104 A.D.3d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Guamal

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Luis GUAMAL, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 27, 2013

Citations

104 A.D.3d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2089
960 N.Y.S.2d 917