From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Grimes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1996
234 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

December 30, 1996.

Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Present — Denman, P.J., Green, Pine, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.


Defendant contends tha t the evidence convicting her of grand larceny in the fourth degree is legally insufficient and tha t her conviction is against the weight of the evidence. We reject those contentions ( see, People v Blackburn, 207 AD2d 1008, lv denied 84 NY2d 1009; see also, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Additionally, there is no merit to the contention that defendant is entitled to sanctions for the alleged violation of Penal Law § 450.10. That issue has not been preserved for our review ( see, CPL 470.05); in any event, there is no proof that the stolen items were in the possession of the police or the District Attorney's office and thus there is no violation of Penal Law § 450.10. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Burke, J. "Grand Larceny, 4th Degree.)


Summaries of

People v. Grimes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 30, 1996
234 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Grimes

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DENISE GRIMES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
652 N.Y.S.2d 581

Citing Cases

In re Matter of Matthew

Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order adjudicating him to be a juvenile delinquent based on findings…