From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Griffiths

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1985
112 A.D.2d 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

July 12, 1985

Appeal from the Oneida County Court, Buckley, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, O'Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court properly refused to suppress drugs and drug paraphernalia discovered at the scene of an automobile accident. The record indicates that the opening of the hatchback and search of defendant's automobile were prompted by defendant's statements that other individuals were trapped in the vehicle. Warrantless searches are justified in such emergency situations ( see, People v. Mitchell, 39 N.Y.2d 173, cert denied 426 U.S. 953; People v. Cruz, 89 A.D.2d 526, affd 59 N.Y.2d 984). The police, therefore, properly seized the contraband that was in plain view ( see, Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, reh denied 404 U.S. 874; People v. Battaglia, 82 A.D.2d 389, revd on other grounds 56 N.Y.2d 558).


Summaries of

People v. Griffiths

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1985
112 A.D.2d 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Griffiths

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BRIAN J. GRIFFITHS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Lowe

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. The Supreme Court correctly denied those branches of the defendant's…

People v. Klossner

Under the circumstances, defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the abandoned vehicle, and the…