From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Griffin

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Oct 1, 2021
198 A.D.3d 1333 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

819 KA 17-00399

10-01-2021

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Darrell J. GRIFFIN, Defendant-Appellant.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (DEREK HARNSBERGER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANET C. SOMES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (DEREK HARNSBERGER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice by reducing the sentence imposed for criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree under count one of the indictment to a determinate term of imprisonment of six years and a period of postrelease supervision of 2½ years and by reducing the sentence imposed for criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree under count two of the indictment to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 2 to 6 years and as modified the judgment is affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of criminal possession of a weapon (CPW) in the second degree ( Penal Law § 265.03 [3] ) and CPW in the third degree (§ 265.02 [3]). Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury (see People v. Danielson , 9 N.Y.3d 342, 349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ), we reject defendant's contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v. Bleakley , 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 [1987] ). However, we agree with defendant that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Thus, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, we modify the judgment by reducing the sentence imposed for CPW in the second degree under count one of the indictment to a determinate term of imprisonment of six years and a period of postrelease supervision of 2½ years and by reducing the sentence imposed for CPW in the third degree under count two of the indictment to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 2 to 6 years (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b] ).


Summaries of

People v. Griffin

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Oct 1, 2021
198 A.D.3d 1333 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Griffin

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Darrell J. GRIFFIN…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 1, 2021

Citations

198 A.D.3d 1333 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
152 N.Y.S.3d 369