From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gremp

Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District
Jun 11, 1974
20 Ill. App. 3d 78 (Ill. App. Ct. 1974)

Opinion

No. 73-127 Reversed and remanded.

June 11, 1974.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Iroquois County; the Hon. ROBERT W. BOYD, Judge, presiding.

Ronald E. Boyer, State's Attorney, of Watseka, for the People.

James Geis, of the State Appellate Defender's Office, of Ottawa, for appellee.


Defendant, Randall S. Gremp, was charged with the offense of unlawful possession of cannabis in excess of 30 grams in violation of section 4(d) of the Cannabis Control Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 56 1/2, par. 704(d)). Defendant moved to suppress the evidence seized by the police officers namely the cannabis and the trial court granted such motion. The State has appealed.

Randall Gremp is one of three codefendants charged with the possession of cannabis arising from the same incident and joined with the other codefendants in moving to suppress the evidence. We have recently considered on this exact question in connection with the consolidated appeals of the other two codefendants, and in People v. Wolf (1973), 15 Ill. App.3d 374, 304 N.E.2d 512, appeal allowed, 56 Ill.2d. ___, we held the trial court erred in suppressing the evidence.

No useful purpose would be served by either reiterating the facts which are amply disclosed in the Wolf case or repeating the reasoning of the court.

Accordingly, the judgment of the circuit court of Iroquois County is reversed and the cause is remanded to said court for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

ALLOY and DIXON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Gremp

Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District
Jun 11, 1974
20 Ill. App. 3d 78 (Ill. App. Ct. 1974)
Case details for

People v. Gremp

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RANDALL S…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District

Date published: Jun 11, 1974

Citations

20 Ill. App. 3d 78 (Ill. App. Ct. 1974)
312 N.E.2d 716

Citing Cases

State v. Greenwood

er than North Carolina have held generally that the detection of odor of marijuana emanating from a…

Kenner v. State

See, e.g., State v. Harrison, 111 Ariz. 508, 533 P.2d 1143 (Ariz. 1975) (odor of marijuana emanating from…