People v. Gregg

4 Citing cases

  1. County of Alameda v. State Bd. of Control

    14 Cal.App.4th 1096 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993)   Cited 21 times
    In County of Alameda v. State Bd. of Control (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 1096, the court held that recovery from the Restitution Fund was limited to victims who could prove that they suffered an actual out-of-pocket loss for which they would not be compensated by any other source.

    We cite Miller for the proposition that a person who suffers only an indirect loss is not a "crime victim." The separate issue of whether a public entity is a "person" entitled to restitution under Government Code section 13967 is pending before the Supreme Court in People v. Gregg (1992), reprinted at 9 Cal.App.4th 814 [4 Cal.Rptr.2d 720] to permit tracking pending review. Our decision that County lacks standing because it is not a crime victim is not based on its status as a public entity, but rather on the indirect nature of the loss it has incurred.

  2. People v. Gregg

    28 Cal. Rptr. 2d 247 (Cal. 1994)

             Prior report: Cal.App., 4 Cal.Rptr.2d 720.          Pursuant to rule 29.4(c), California Rules of Court, the above-entitled review is DISMISSED and cause is remanded to the Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District.

  3. People v. Gregg

    8 Cal. Rptr. 2d 677 (Cal. 1992)

    Prior report: Cal.App., 4 Cal.Rptr.2d 720. Petition for review GRANTED.

  4. People v. Gregg

    3 Cal.App.4th 794 (Cal. Ct. App. 1992)   Cited 1 times

    REVIEW GRANTED Reprinted without change in 9 Cal.App.4th 814, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.