Opinion
December 4, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, we find that as part of his plea bargain, he voluntarily, intelligently, knowingly, and specifically waived his right to appellate review of the denial of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress his statement to a Federal agent (see, People v Williams, 36 N.Y.2d 829, cert denied 423 U.S. 873; see also, People v Esajerre, 35 N.Y.2d 463; People v Irizarry, 32 A.D.2d 967, affd 27 N.Y.2d 856), and the denials of his motions for reassignment of new counsel. Accordingly, this appeal does not properly bring up for review the denial of those motions (see, People v Andrews, 146 A.D.2d 787; cf., People v Bray, 154 A.D.2d 692). Brown, J.P., Lawrence, Kooper and Balletta, JJ., concur.