Opinion
October 30, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Rohl, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying youthful offender treatment to the defendant and, in view of his extensive criminal background, we decline to exercise our discretion to grant the defendant youthful offender treatment (see, People v Kane, 100 A.D.2d 944). Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Brown, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.