From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1995
212 A.D.2d 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 3, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Doyle, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Fallon, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of one count each of criminal sale and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, defendant contends that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence because an investigator who identified defendant failed to note the existence of defendant's facial scar. The only proof that defendant had that scar on the date of the transaction was the testimony to that effect by defense witnesses. We conclude that, even if the jury credited that testimony, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495). The investigator testified that he had a clear view of defendant under good lighting conditions over a period of 10 to 15 minutes. He further testified that defendant was wearing a military fatigue jacket with a flared collar that may have obscured the sides of defendant's face but did not prevent the investigator from viewing the front of defendant's face.


Summaries of

People v. Gray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1995
212 A.D.2d 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Gray

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DONALD GRAY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 3, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
623 N.Y.S.2d 441