Opinion
March 23, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant claims that the plea bargain herein unlawfully violated the restrictions on bargaining contained in CPL 220.10 (5) (d) (ii). However, assuming, arguendo, that any such error exists, it cannot be said to have "adversely affected" (CPL 470.15) the defendant, and vacatur of the plea is unwarranted (see, People v Flores, 167 A.D.2d 160; People v Alvarez, 166 A.D.2d 603; People v Coffey, 124 A.D.2d 814). Balletta, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Copertino, JJ., concur.