From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Grant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1997
245 A.D.2d 1053 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 31, 1997

Present — Denman, P.J., Lawton, Hayes, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in refusing to discharge for cause a prospective juror who was related to two members of a local law enforcement agency. We disagree. That prospective juror expressed in unequivocal terms her ability to render a fair and impartial verdict based upon the evidence presented at trial ( see, People v. Blyden, 55 N.Y.2d 73, 77-78).

The jury's verdict is not against the weight of the evidence ( see, People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the court's alibi charge ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Bloom, 241 A.D.2d 975). We decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see, People v. Bloom, supra). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Sheridan, J. — Burglary, 3rd Degree.)


Summaries of

People v. Grant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 31, 1997
245 A.D.2d 1053 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Grant

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GEORGE GRANT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 1053 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 70