From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Grandison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 1994
206 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

July 5, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (O'Dwyer, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the trial court did not commit reversible error by denying his request for a missing witness charge. Although it was error for the trial court to deny the requested charge (see, People v. Kitching, 78 N.Y.2d 532; People v. Gonzalez, 68 N.Y.2d 424), the error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt (see, People v. Fields, 76 N.Y.2d 761; People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; see also, People v Torres, 80 N.Y.2d 944; People v. Logan, 74 N.Y.2d 859; People v Hopkins, 76 N.Y.2d 872; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245), or without merit (see, People v. Robert, 184 A.D.2d 597). O'Brien, J.P., Pizzuto, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Grandison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 5, 1994
206 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Grandison

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JERRY GRANDISON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 5, 1994

Citations

206 A.D.2d 389 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
614 N.Y.S.2d 322

Citing Cases

People v. Bernhardt

When jury selection for the defendant's second trial began on November 19th, before the same Trial Judge, the…