From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Granby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 15, 2008
50 A.D.3d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2006-09388.

April 15, 2008.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mullen, J.), rendered June 16, 2006, convicting him of attempted unlawfully dealing with a child in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Del Atwell, East Hampton, N.Y., for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Karla Lato of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Dillon, Balkin and Leventhal, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that he was denied his right to the effective assistance of counsel rests on matter partially dehors the record and to that extent it may not be reviewed on direct appeal ( see People v Gonzalez, 44 AD3d 871, lv denied 9 NY3d 1006; People v Bolden, 44 AD3d 784). To the extent that the claim is based upon the record, it is without merit ( see Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668, 687; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Granby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 15, 2008
50 A.D.3d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

People v. Granby

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOSHUA GRANBY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 15, 2008

Citations

50 A.D.3d 920 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 3473
854 N.Y.S.2d 675

Citing Cases

People v. Nikc

Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility is primarily a matter to be determined by the finder of fact,…