From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Graham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 27, 1999
261 A.D.2d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 27, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's assertions on appeal, the lineup procedure was not unduly suggestive ( see, People v. Chipp, 75 N.Y.2d 327, cert denied 498 U.S. 833; People v. Gelzer, 224 A.D.2d 443; People v. Bookman, 232 A.D.2d 498).

The sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive ( see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Graham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 27, 1999
261 A.D.2d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Graham

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KENNETH GRAHAM…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 27, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 413 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
688 N.Y.S.2d 890

Citing Cases

People v. Foster

The defendant's contention that the lineup procedure was unduly suggestive since he was the only participant…