holding that a retrial was necessary where the jury had not been instructed that respondent's condition must affect his ability to control his sexual behavior
Summary of this case from People v. GoughNo. 2-00-1304.
February 11, 2004.
Appeal from Ogle County.
Disposition of Cases by Order Rev'd rem.
holding that a retrial was necessary where the jury had not been instructed that respondent's condition must affect his ability to control his sexual behavior
Summary of this case from People v. GoughFull title:People v. Gough
Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Second District
Date published: Feb 11, 2004
Finally, the recent supreme court decision in People v. New, 2014 IL 116306, does not require a new trial. ¶…
Gough v. Garnett(Doc. 1, p. 5). He appealed that determination, and in March 2004, the Illinois Appellate Court reversed and…