From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gosso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 18, 1987
130 A.D.2d 683 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

May 18, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.).


Ordered that the judgment and order are affirmed.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to permit the defendant to withdraw his plea or in denying his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (see, People v. Dixon, 29 N.Y.2d 55).

The defendant's claim that he was unable to comprehend the proceedings due to having taken medication is not supported by the record. No substantive basis was set forth to warrant a reasonable belief that the defendant was, in any way, incapacitated, and sufficient inquiry was made at the time of the plea to determine that he entered it knowingly and voluntarily (see, People v. Fridell, 93 A.D.2d 866). Mangano, J.P., Eiber, Kunzeman and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Gosso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 18, 1987
130 A.D.2d 683 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

People v. Gosso

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DWAYNE GOSSO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 18, 1987

Citations

130 A.D.2d 683 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

People v. Vianale

The defendant asserts that he was incapacitated or otherwise unable to comprehend the proceedings wherein he…

People v. Martin

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed. The record amply demonstrates that the defendant knowingly,…