From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gopal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 2003
305 A.D.2d 127 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1034

May 1, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Cataldo, J.), rendered June 27, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of 5 years probation, 500 hours of community service, and $6,816 of restitution, unanimously affirmed.

Priscilla Steward, for respondent.

Daniel M. Perez, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Saxe, J.P., Ellerin, Williams, Lerner, Marlow, JJ.


The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility. The People presented compelling expert and statistical evidence warranting the conclusion that defendant's transactions involving damaged MetroCards were fraudulent and could not have been legitimate performances of his duties as a Transit Authority employee (see People v. McCorgray, 163 A.D.2d 263, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 880). Furthermore, a witness, properly credited by the jury, testified that he sold a quantity of bent MetroCards to defendant and watched defendant use his computer to create new cards.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Gopal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 2003
305 A.D.2d 127 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Gopal

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DHANIRAM GOPAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 127 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 750

Citing Cases

People v. Campbell

The evidence excluded beyond a reasonable doubt any reasonable hypothesis of innocence. The People's detailed…

People v. Ashby

The verdict was based upon legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence ( see…