From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gonzalez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 22, 1994
210 A.D.2d 168 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

December 22, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, Allen Alpert, J., Joan Carey, J.


The challenged showup, which occurred in close proximity to the time and place of the crime while defendant was sitting handcuffed in the back of a police patrol car, was not unduly suggestive (see, People v Duuvon, 77 N.Y.2d 541; People v Ford, 195 A.D.2d 298, lv denied 82 N.Y.2d 805). A showup procedure such as was used here was justified in the interest of prompt identification (People v Love, 57 N.Y.2d 1023).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman, Asch and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Gonzalez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 22, 1994
210 A.D.2d 168 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROLANDO GONZALEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1994

Citations

210 A.D.2d 168 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
620 N.Y.S.2d 957

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the suppression court properly…

People v. Smith

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. "Showup procedures which are close in time and location to the scene…