From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gonzalez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 2004
9 A.D.3d 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2001-10323.

July 6, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), rendered November 1, 2001, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, criminal mischief in the fourth degree, criminal impersonation in the first degree, and possession of burglar tools, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Before: Smith, J.P., Krausman, Crane and Spolzino, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the prosecutor's summation deprived him of a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Malave, 7 AD3d 542 [May 3, 2004])

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review.


Summaries of

People v. Gonzalez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 6, 2004
9 A.D.3d 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SALVADOR GONZALEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 6, 2004

Citations

9 A.D.3d 374 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
778 N.Y.S.2d 921

Citing Cases

People v. Moyaho

The defendant's contention that certain comments made by the prosecutor during summation constituted…