From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gonzalez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 2, 2001
280 A.D.2d 274 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

February 2, 2001.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Juanita Bing Newton, J.), entered on or about September 30, 1997, which denied appellant surety's motion for remission of cash bail forfeited on March 18, 1996, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Richard Nahas for respondent.

Pro Se for surety-appellant.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Wallach, Lerner, Rubin, JJ.


The surety's motion for remission of bail, made some 16 months after forfeiture of the bail at issue, was untimely (see, CPL 540.30). Moreover, the surety did not sustain her burden of submitting a detailed affidavit showing that defendant's absence was non-willful (see, Indemnity Ins. Co. v. People, 133 A.D.2d 345, 346, lv denied, 70 N.Y.2d 613), and, in any event, there are no exceptional circumstances warranting the relief sought (see, People v. Cotto, 262 A.D.2d 138).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Gonzalez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 2, 2001
280 A.D.2d 274 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DIEGO GONZALEZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 2, 2001

Citations

280 A.D.2d 274 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
720 N.Y.S.2d 340

Citing Cases

People v. Nichols

When this occurs, the surety may make an application for remission of the forfeited bail, which the court may…

People v. Lennon

Contrary to the appellants' contention, the Supreme Court's determination to deny even partial remission of…