From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gonzalez

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Nov 3, 2022
No. 358400 (Mich. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2022)

Opinion

358400

11-03-2022

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANDY GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.


Kent Circuit Court LC No. 17-005065-FC

Before: Shapiro, P.J., and Gadola and Yates, JJ.

SHAPIRO, P.J. (CONCURRING).

I concur in affirming defendant's sentence. I write separately to respectfully suggest that the Michigan Supreme Court revisit the question whether simultaneous offenses can be counted separately for purposes of the habitual offender statutes given that doing so is inconsistent with the plain meaning of "habitual" and the clearly apparent intent of the habitual offender statutes to address repeat offenders. See People v Preuss, 436 Mich. 714; 461 N.W.2d 703 (1990), and People v Stoudemire, 429 Mich. 262; 414 N.W.2d 693 (1987), overruled by People v Gardner, 482 Mich. 41; 753 N.W.2d 78 (2008).


Summaries of

People v. Gonzalez

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Nov 3, 2022
No. 358400 (Mich. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2022)
Case details for

People v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANDY GONZALEZ…

Court:Court of Appeals of Michigan

Date published: Nov 3, 2022

Citations

No. 358400 (Mich. Ct. App. Nov. 3, 2022)