From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gonzalez

California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, First Division
Apr 16, 2010
No. D055769 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 16, 2010)

Opinion


THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILFREDO GONZALEZ, Defendant and Appellant. D055769 California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, First Division April 16, 2010

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court No. SCE284290 of San Diego County, Patricia K. Cookson, Judge.

McDONALD, J.

Wilfredo Gonzalez entered a negotiated guilty plea to two counts of committing a lewd act on a child under the age of 14 (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (a)). After the court placed Gonzalez on four years' probation, Gonzalez retained new counsel who filed a motion to withdraw the plea. In the motion Gonzalez asserted former counsel gave him incorrect advice concerning the immigration consequences of the plea. The court denied the motion. Gonzalez appeals. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Gonzalez's eight-year-old niece fell asleep on his living room couch when she was spending the night at his home. When she woke up, she was in his bedroom. He pressed his penis against her body and put his finger in her vagina.

DISCUSSION

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and proceedings below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel lists, as possible but not arguable issues, (1) whether the court abused its discretion by denying Gonzalez's motion to withdraw the guilty plea and (2) whether the plea is invalid as a result of ineffective assistance of counsel.

We granted Gonzalez permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has responded and requests dismissal of the charges so he will not be deported. He says deportation would separate him from his wife and three children and would cause psychological trauma to all. Gonzalez has not shown any legal basis for reversing the conviction.

A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, including the possible issues listed pursuant to Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Gonzalez has been competently represented by counsel on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

WE CONCUR: HUFFMAN, Acting P. J., IRION, J.


Summaries of

People v. Gonzalez

California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, First Division
Apr 16, 2010
No. D055769 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 16, 2010)
Case details for

People v. Gonzalez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILFREDO GONZALEZ, Defendant and…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, First Division

Date published: Apr 16, 2010

Citations

No. D055769 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 16, 2010)