Opinion
July 6, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bonnie Wittner, J.).
The omission of defendant's description in the arrest report does not support an inference that defendant did not match the description earlier given by the complainants, and thus the court properly precluded defense counsel from eliciting testimony in respect to such omission from the police officer who filled out the arrest report and from arguing such inference in summation.
Defendant's Rosario claim that the court should have given an adverse inference charge because of the People's failure to turn over a police officer's notes containing the complainants' description of defendant is unavailing since the existence of such notes is pure speculation ( People v. Damaceno, 214 A.D.2d 464).
We have reviewed defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Ross, Asch and Tom, JJ.