From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gomez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 28, 1998
256 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 28, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sampson, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court erred when it excluded two nondisruptive children from the courtroom, one of whom was apparently the defendant's, only because it was the court's policy to exclude children from the courtroom, thereby denying the defendant his right to a public trial ( see, People v. Miller, 224 A.D.2d 639). His conviction must therefore be reversed, and a new trial ordered.

In light of our determination, we need not reach the defendant's remaining contentions.

Copertino, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Gomez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 28, 1998
256 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Gomez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAFAEL GOMEZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 28, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
685 N.Y.S.2d 448

Citing Cases

People v. Santiago

The Supreme Court did not err in excluding the defendant's children from the courtroom during summations…

People v. Richardson

Buckley, J.P., Sullivan, Lerner, Friedman, JJ. The trial court's exclusion of defendant's children, ages…