From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gomez

Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1984
158 Cal.App.3d 446 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In People v. Gomez (1984) 158 Cal.App.3d 446 [204 Cal.Rptr. 655], and People v. Carreon (1984) 151 Cal.App.3d 559 [ 198 Cal.Rptr. 843], the First District, Division Three, and the Fifth District, respectively, held that the denial of the right to an interpreter is not reversible per se but reversible only when defendant demonstrates he has suffered prejudice.

Summary of this case from In re Dung T.
See 1 Summary

Opinion

1984.

[EDITORS' NOTE: PAGES 447 — 455 CONTAINING PEOPLE v. GOMEZ HAVE BEEN OMITTED.]

Deleted on direction of Supreme Court by order dated November 1, 1984.

Summaries of

People v. Gomez

Court of Appeal of California
Jan 1, 1984
158 Cal.App.3d 446 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984)

In People v. Gomez (1984) 158 Cal.App.3d 446 [204 Cal.Rptr. 655], and People v. Carreon (1984) 151 Cal.App.3d 559 [ 198 Cal.Rptr. 843], the First District, Division Three, and the Fifth District, respectively, held that the denial of the right to an interpreter is not reversible per se but reversible only when defendant demonstrates he has suffered prejudice.

Summary of this case from In re Dung T.
Case details for

People v. Gomez

Case Details

Full title:People v. Gomez

Court:Court of Appeal of California

Date published: Jan 1, 1984

Citations

158 Cal.App.3d 446 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

In re Dung T.

(2b) The standard of reversibility to be applied when the right to an interpreter has been violated has been…

1 Citing Cases