Opinion
B161231.
7-22-2003
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MARLENE JEAN GOLDBERG, Defendant and Appellant.
Richard Schwartzberg, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Appellant Marlene Goldberg appeals from judgment entered after conviction following her plea of guilty to one count of possession of cocaine and her admission of an allegation she had served three prior prison terms within the meaning of Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b). The court found her eligible for Proposition 36 treatment and placed her on probation. Approximately six months later, the court revoked Goldbergs probation based upon the filing of a new felony charge against
her. Following an evidentiary hearing, the court found Goldberg in violation of her probation and sentenced her to four years four months in prison.
We appointed counsel to represent Goldberg on appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues and asking this court to independently review the record. On May 12, 2003, we advised Goldberg she had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues she wished us to consider. To date, we have received no response.
We have examined the entire record and are satisfied Goldbergs attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441, 158 Cal. Rptr. 839, 600 P.2d 1071.)
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
We concur: COOPER, P.J., and RUBIN, J.