From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Godfrey

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 28, 2016
142 A.D.3d 1184 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

09-28-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Eric GODFREY, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, NY, for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Seth M. Lieberman of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, NY, for appellant.

Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Seth M. Lieberman of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), imposed December 11, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid, as the record fails to establish that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Johnson, 109 A.D.3d 1004, 971 N.Y.S.2d 469 ). Thus, the waiver does not preclude review of this excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., LEVENTHAL, COHEN, LaSALLE and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Godfrey

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 28, 2016
142 A.D.3d 1184 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Godfrey

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Eric GODFREY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 28, 2016

Citations

142 A.D.3d 1184 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 6228
37 N.Y.S.3d 903