From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Glusko

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 5, 2014
114 A.D.3d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-02-5

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. John GLUSKO, appellant.

Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, N.Y., for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Joan H. McCarthy of counsel), for respondent.



Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, N.Y., for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Joan H. McCarthy of counsel), for respondent.
PETER B. SKELOS, J.P., PLUMMER E. LOTT, SHERI S. ROMAN, and ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), rendered April 13, 2011, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not move to withdraw the plea ( see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5; People v. Pryor, 11 A.D.3d 565, 782 N.Y.S.2d 803). In any event, the plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made ( see People v. Fiumefreddo, 82 N.Y.2d 536, 543, 605 N.Y.S.2d 671, 626 N.E.2d 646; People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d at 666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5; People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 17, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170). The defendant's postplea assertions regarding the defense of justification did not warrant vacatur of his plea of guilty ( see People v. Bunn, 79 A.D.3d 1143, 914 N.Y.S.2d 907).

The defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel, as defense counsel provided meaningful representation ( see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584; People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 444 N.Y.S.2d 893, 429 N.E.2d 400).

The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).


Summaries of

People v. Glusko

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Feb 5, 2014
114 A.D.3d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Glusko

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. John GLUSKO, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 5, 2014

Citations

114 A.D.3d 701 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
114 A.D.3d 701
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 683

Citing Cases

People v. Mills

There was nothing in the plea proceedings that triggered the court's duty to inquire into a potential…

People v. Gomez

and voluntarily entered a plea of guilty with a full understanding of the consequences, and that there was…