From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Glusko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 28, 2009
64 A.D.3d 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2007-08169.

July 28, 2009.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), rendered August 10, 2007, convicting him of criminal contempt in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Gary E. Eisenberg, New City, N.Y., for appellant, and appellant pro se.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Bridget Rahilly Steller of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Covello, Eng and Hall, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted ( see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

The defendant has not, nor could he have, raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief.


Summaries of

People v. Glusko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 28, 2009
64 A.D.3d 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

People v. Glusko

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN GLUSKO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 28, 2009

Citations

64 A.D.3d 789 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 6034
882 N.Y.S.2d 660

Citing Cases

People v. Glusko

John Glusko, Dannemora, N.Y., appellant pro se. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y.…