From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Glusko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 1995
213 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 20, 1995

Appeal from the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish that the defendant caused damage to the complainant's property in excess of $250 (see, Penal Law § 145.05). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15).

The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Glusko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 1995
213 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Glusko

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN GLUSKO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 20, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 915