From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Glenn

California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, First Division
May 30, 2008
No. D051749 (Cal. Ct. App. May. 30, 2008)

Opinion


THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. THOMAS PATRICK GLENN IV, Defendant and Appellant. D051749 California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, First Division May 30, 2008

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County No. SCE272805, Patricia K. Cookson, Judge.

NARES, J.

Thomas Patrick Glenn IV entered a negotiated guilty plea to one count of possessing methamphetamine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378, subd. (a)) and admitted he had served a prior prison term within the meaning of Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b). Under the plea bargain, in which the prosecution agreed to dismiss three other drug-related counts and two prior prison allegations, Glenn was to receive a stipulated sentence of four years. The trial court sentenced Glenn to four years in prison: the upper term of three years for the possession for sale count and a consecutive one-year enhancement for the prior prison term. The court denied Glenn's request for a certificate of probable cause.

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief setting forth evidence in the superior court. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks that this court review the record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel refers to as possible, but not arguable, issues: (1) whether Glenn's guilty plea was constitutionally valid; and (2) whether the trial court violated Glenn's right to a jury trial on aggravating factors or abused its discretion in imposing a four-year prison sentence.

We granted Glenn permission to file a brief on his own behalf. He has not responded.

A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the possible issues referred to by appellate counsel, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Competent counsel has represented Glenn on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

WE CONCUR: HUFFMAN, Acting P. J., IRION, J.


Summaries of

People v. Glenn

California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, First Division
May 30, 2008
No. D051749 (Cal. Ct. App. May. 30, 2008)
Case details for

People v. Glenn

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. THOMAS PATRICK GLENN IV…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, First Division

Date published: May 30, 2008

Citations

No. D051749 (Cal. Ct. App. May. 30, 2008)