From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Glen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2000
278 A.D.2d 243 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued November 17, 2000.

December 6, 2000.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowling, J.), rendered March 29, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Louis R. Rosenthal, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Eric Nelson and David Schwartz), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Cynthia Kean of counsel), for respondent.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly admitted evidence that the defendant's authorization to possess a weapon was terminated by the New York City Department of Corrections in August 1997. Such evidence was probative of the defendant's unlawful possession of a weapon, an element of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (see, Penal Law § 265.03; People v. Satiro, 72 N.Y.2d 821; People v. Alvino, 71 N.Y.2d 233; People v. Herrera, 191 A.D.2d 585).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Glen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 2000
278 A.D.2d 243 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Glen

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. AARON GLEN, APPELLANT. (IND. NO. 7013/98)

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 6, 2000

Citations

278 A.D.2d 243 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
716 N.Y.S.2d 908

Citing Cases

People v. Glen

February 14, 2002. Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of…

Glen v. Senkowski

On December 4, 2000, the Appellate Division unanimously affirmed defendant's judgment of conviction. People…