From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Glasper

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 10, 1964
200 N.E.2d 776 (N.Y. 1964)

Opinion

Argued June 10, 1964

Decided July 10, 1964

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, SAMUEL S. LEIBOWITZ, J.

Peter R. Rosenblatt for appellant.

Edward S. Silver, District Attorney ( William I. Siegel of counsel), for respondent.


Order reversed, the matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, and a hearing directed. The factual allegations of coercion by the Judge leading to a plea of guilty are sufficient on their face to require a hearing ( People v. Picciotti, 4 N.Y.2d 340; People v. Pearson, 12 N.Y.2d 978; People v. Lake, 14 N.Y.2d 790).

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS and BERGAN. Judges DYE, BURKE and SCILEPPI dissent and vote to affirm.


Summaries of

People v. Glasper

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 10, 1964
200 N.E.2d 776 (N.Y. 1964)
Case details for

People v. Glasper

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANKLIN GLASPER…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 10, 1964

Citations

200 N.E.2d 776 (N.Y. 1964)
200 N.E.2d 776
252 N.Y.S.2d 92

Citing Cases

People v. Thomas

Defendant contends that by reason thereof he pleaded guilty and that his plea was the product of fear,…

People v. Rodriguez

In fact, as the transcript of March 11 reveals, he was steadfast in his denial of guilt. Standing against…