From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Gkanios

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 1993
199 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

December 6, 1993

Appeal from the County Court, Westchester County (Silverman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by deleting the provision in the sentence directing the defendant to make restitution in an amount not to exceed $10,000; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the record supports a finding that he entered his plea knowingly and voluntarily (see, People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9). Accordingly, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty (see, People v Kade, 153 A.D.2d 907, 908). However, the People concede, and we agree, that the restitution provision should be vacated because the victim never incurred any out-of-pocket costs. The express purpose of the restitution provision was to defray the cost of any counseling expenses which the victim might incur in the future. Thereafter, the victim apparently failed to seek counseling. Accordingly, there is no need for restitution. Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Gkanios

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 1993
199 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Gkanios

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FATIOS GKANIOS, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 6, 1993

Citations

199 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
605 N.Y.S.2d 942