From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Givens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 8, 2001
284 A.D.2d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

June 8, 2001.

(Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Fahey, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.)

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., HAYES, WISNER, KEHOE AND LAWTON, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of two counts each of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.06), and one count of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (Penal Law § 220.03). Defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his motion to suppress cocaine found by police during a search of 1002 Midland Avenue. Defendant offered no evidence at the suppression hearing that he had an expectation of privacy at that residence, and thus the court properly determined that defendant lacks standing to challenge the legality of the search ( see, People v. Wesley, 73 N.Y.2d 351, 357-359). Defendant received effective assistance of counsel ( see, People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 147), and the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. Contrary to defendant's further contention, the verdict is not repugnant ( see generally, People v. Tucker, 55 N.Y.2d 1, 7, rearg denied 55 N.Y.2d 1039).

We conclude, however, that count five of the indictment charging defendant with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree is a lesser inclusory concurrent count of count four charging defendant with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree ( see, People v. Greer, 217 A.D.2d 1003, 1004). Although the error is not preserved for our review, we modify the judgment as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice by reversing defendant's conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree under count five of the indictment, vacating the sentence imposed thereon and dismissing that count of the indictment.


Summaries of

People v. Givens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jun 8, 2001
284 A.D.2d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Givens

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MACK GIVENS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jun 8, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
727 N.Y.S.2d 371

Citing Cases

Roldan v. County of Suffolk

His right to be so exempted is qualified by the requirement that he sound such an audible signal by siren as…

People v. Moore

We agree with defendant, however, that counts 7, 10, and 14 of the indictment, charging him with forcible…