From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Giorno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 24, 1963
19 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

October 24, 1963

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court.

Present — Williams, P.J., Goldman, Henry and Noonan, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, indictment reinstated, and matter remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum, all without prejudice to defendants' rights to renew motion to dismiss indictment after the determination of the motion to suppress and return evidence claimed to have been improperly seized. Memorandum: After the defendants were permitted an inspection of the Grand Jury minutes, a motion was made to dismiss the indictment for insufficiency of the evidence before the Grand Jury. Combined with this motion was an application, in effect, for the suppression and return of articles which it was claimed were improperly seized from the defendants at the time of their arrest, and which were introduced in evidence before the Grand Jury. The County Court Judge heard the motion for suppression and return in an informal manner upon affidavits submitted and upon his own inspection of the Grand Jury minutes. The proceeding for suppression and return was instituted under sections 813-c, 813-d and 813-e of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Section 813-c provides that upon such a motion "The court shall hear evidence upon any issue of fact necessary to determination of the motion". Although there were issues of fact, no evidence was taken and the proceeding was conducted and determined in a most informal and casual way. However, such a proceeding requires substantial formality. ( People v. Lombardi, 18 A.D.2d 177.) The order should be reversed and the matter remitted to Onondaga County Court for a determination of the motion to suppress and return, said proceeding to be conducted in accordance with the requirements of sections 813-c, 813-d and 813-e of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Our order should be without prejudice to the right of the defendants to renew their motion to dismiss the indictment because of insufficiency of testimony before the Grand Jury, after the determination of the proceeding to suppress and return.


Summaries of

People v. Giorno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 24, 1963
19 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

People v. Giorno

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. JOHN DEL GIORNO and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 24, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)